Gross result
€40.5m
−54.0% vs previous season
18th highest value of 18
1. FC Heidenheim
Lowest equity ratio in the Bundesliga 2024/25: 4.2%; the median is 28%.
2. Bundesliga 2018/19 to 2022/23, Bundesliga 2023/24 to 2024/25. On the gross result, from 16th to 18th place over this period.
Wage bill
€20.6m
−47.9% vs previous season
18th highest value of 18
Net result
−€0.3m
−€2.0m vs previous season
14th highest value of 18
Equity
€2.0m
−€0.3m vs previous season
18th highest value of 18
Equity ratio
4.2%
−0.5pp vs previous season
18th highest value of 18
At a glance
- Over the last 3 seasons, 3.7 places better in the table than on the gross result.
Heidenheim: gross result almost unchanged since 2018/19
2018/19 to 2024/25, €m
- League median
Source: DFL, club financial figures
Heidenheim: league position and revenue rank on average 1.9 places apart
2018/19 to 2024/25
- League position
- Revenue rank on the gross result
Source: DFL, club financial figures; final tables
Equity: Heidenheim
2018/19 to 2024/25, €m
Source: DFL, club financial figures
Equity ratio 2024/25
4.2%
very low: below 10% is considered critical.
Heidenheim funds 4% of its balance sheet from equity, as in 2018/19
Shares of total assets, 2018/19 to 2024/25
Source: DFL, club financial figures
Heidenheim closes 2024/25 with a deficit of €0.3m
2024/25, €m, excluding items under €50k
Source: DFL, club financial figures
Heidenheim: wage ratio from 40% (2018/19) to 51% (2024/25)
2018/19 to 2024/25
- Heidenheim by season
- Bundesliga 2024/25
Source: DFL, club financial figures
Season 2024/25
Position in the league
| Key figure | Value | better |
|---|---|---|
| Gross result | €40.5m18 of 18 | |
| Wage bill | €20.6m18 of 18 | |
| Wage ratio | 50.9%6 of 18 | |
| Net result | −€0.3m14 of 18 | |
| Equity | €2.0m18 of 18 | |
| Equity ratio | 4.2%18 of 18 | |
| Liabilities | €31.3m13 of 18 | |
| Payments to player agents | €1.2m18 of 18 |
Heidenheim ranks 18th on the gross result in the Bundesliga
18 clubs, 2024/25, €m
- Median
Source: DFL, club financial figures
Compare with
