Eintracht Frankfurt

Bundesliga

Bundesliga 2018/19 to 2019/20. On the gross result, from 3rd to 9th place over this period.

Gross result

€146.0m

−51.6% vs previous season

9th highest value of 18

Wage bill

€84.0m

−9.7% vs previous season

8th highest value of 18

Net result

−€37.2m

−€74.1m vs previous season

15th highest value of 18

Equity

€30.6m

−€37.3m vs previous season

12th highest value of 18

Equity ratio

20.0%

−13.9pp vs previous season

11th highest value of 18

Frankfurt has increased its gross result by 25% since 2018/19

2018/19 to 2024/25, €m

  • League median

Source: DFL, club financial figures

Frankfurt: league position and revenue rank on average 0.6 places apart

2018/19 to 2024/25

  • League position
  • Revenue rank on the gross result

Source: DFL, club financial figures; final tables

Equity: Frankfurt

2018/19 to 2024/25, €m

Source: DFL, club financial figures

Equity ratio 2019/20

20.0%

low: below 30% is considered thin.

11th highest value of 18 · league median 36.2%

Frankfurt: equity ratio down 13 percentage points since 2018/19

Shares of total assets, 2018/19 to 2024/25

Source: DFL, club financial figures

Frankfurt closes 2019/20 with a deficit of €37.2m

2019/20, €m, excluding items under €50k

Source: DFL, club financial figures

Frankfurt: wage ratio from 31% (2018/19) to 47% (2024/25)

2018/19 to 2024/25

  • Frankfurt by season
  • Bundesliga 2024/25

Source: DFL, club financial figures

Season 2019/20

Position in the league

Key figureValueRankMedianworsebetter
Gross result €146.0m9 of 18 9 of 18 €132.3m
Wage bill €84.0m8 of 18 8 of 18 €81.8m
Wage ratio 57.5%8 of 18 8 of 18 54.5%
Net result −€37.2m15 of 18 15 of 18 −€1.1m
Equity €30.6m12 of 18 12 of 18 €42.0m
Equity ratio 20.0%11 of 18 11 of 18 36.2%
Liabilities €106.4m8 of 18 8 of 18 €82.3m
Payments to player agents €10.4m8 of 18 8 of 18 €8.6m

Frankfurt ranks 9th on the gross result in the Bundesliga

18 clubs, 2019/20, €m

  • Median

Source: DFL, club financial figures

Compare with

Clubs of similar size

All four compared