Fortuna Düsseldorf

Bundesliga

Bundesliga 2018/19 to 2019/20. On the gross result, from 18th to 16th place over this period.

Gross result

€80.4m

+14.6% vs previous season

16th highest value of 18

Wage bill

€37.8m

+17.7% vs previous season

16th highest value of 18

Net result

€0.0m

−€2.1m vs previous season

7th highest value of 18

Equity

€7.0m

±€0.0m vs previous season

15th highest value of 18

Equity ratio

15.8%

−6.6pp vs previous season

13th highest value of 18

Düsseldorf: gross result almost unchanged since 2018/19

2018/19 to 2023/24, €m

  • League median

Source: DFL, club financial figures

Düsseldorf: league position and revenue rank on average 0.3 places apart

2018/19 to 2024/25

  • League position
  • Revenue rank on the gross result

Source: DFL, club financial figures; final tables

Equity: Düsseldorf

2018/19 to 2023/24, €m

Source: DFL, club financial figures

Equity ratio 2019/20

15.8%

low: below 30% is considered thin.

13th highest value of 18 · league median 36.2%

Düsseldorf: equity ratio down 18 percentage points since 2018/19

Shares of total assets, 2018/19 to 2023/24

Source: DFL, club financial figures

Düsseldorf closes 2019/20 with a surplus of €0.0m

2019/20, €m, excluding items under €50k

Source: DFL, club financial figures

Düsseldorf: wage ratio stable at around 43% since 2018/19

2018/19 to 2023/24

  • Düsseldorf by season
  • 2. Bundesliga 2023/24

Source: DFL, club financial figures

Season 2019/20

Position in the league

Key figureValueRankMedianworsebetter
Gross result €80.4m16 of 18 16 of 18 €132.3m
Wage bill €37.8m16 of 18 16 of 18 €81.8m
Wage ratio 47.0%14 of 18 14 of 18 54.5%
Net result €0.0m7 of 18 7 of 18 −€1.1m
Equity €7.0m15 of 18 15 of 18 €42.0m
Equity ratio 15.8%13 of 18 13 of 18 36.2%
Liabilities €26.9m16 of 18 16 of 18 €82.3m
Payments to player agents €2.9m16 of 18 16 of 18 €8.6m

Düsseldorf ranks 16th on the gross result in the Bundesliga

18 clubs, 2019/20, €m

  • Median

Source: DFL, club financial figures

Compare with

Clubs of similar size

All four compared