RB Leipzig

Bundesliga

Bundesliga 2018/19 to 2019/20. On the gross result, from 4th to 3rd place over this period.

Gross result

€325.1m

+18.4% vs previous season

3rd highest value of 18

Wage bill

€147.1m

+17.4% vs previous season

3rd highest value of 18

Net result

€8.9m

+€4.4m vs previous season

2nd highest value of 18

Equity

€131.4m

+€5.3m vs previous season

5th highest value of 18

Equity ratio

34.1%

−6.2pp vs previous season

10th highest value of 18

RB Leipzig has increased its gross result by 68% since 2018/19

2018/19 to 2024/25, €m

  • League median

Source: DFL, club financial figures

RB Leipzig: league position and revenue rank on average 0.6 places apart

2018/19 to 2024/25

  • League position
  • Revenue rank on the gross result

Source: DFL, club financial figures; final tables

Equity: RB Leipzig

2018/19 to 2024/25, €m

Source: DFL, club financial figures

Equity ratio 2019/20

34.1%

solid: above 30% is considered stable.

10th highest value of 18 · league median 36.2%

RB Leipzig: equity ratio down 19 percentage points since 2018/19

Shares of total assets, 2018/19 to 2024/25

Source: DFL, club financial figures

RB Leipzig closes 2019/20 with a surplus of €8.9m

2019/20, €m, excluding items under €50k

Source: DFL, club financial figures

RB Leipzig: wage ratio stable at around 45% since 2018/19

2018/19 to 2024/25

  • RB Leipzig by season
  • Bundesliga 2024/25

Source: DFL, club financial figures

Season 2019/20

Position in the league

Key figureValueRankMedianworsebetter
Gross result €325.1m3 of 18 3 of 18 €132.3m
Wage bill €147.1m3 of 18 3 of 18 €81.8m
Wage ratio 45.2%17 of 18 17 of 18 54.5%
Net result €8.9m2 of 18 2 of 18 −€1.1m
Equity €131.4m5 of 18 5 of 18 €42.0m
Equity ratio 34.1%10 of 18 10 of 18 36.2%
Liabilities €190.2m3 of 18 3 of 18 €82.3m
Payments to player agents €19.4m3 of 18 3 of 18 €8.6m

RB Leipzig has the third-highest gross result in the Bundesliga

18 clubs, 2019/20, €m

  • Median

Source: DFL, club financial figures

Compare with

Clubs of similar size

All four compared