RB Leipzig

Bundesliga

Bundesliga 2018/19 to 2020/21. On the gross result, from 4th to 2nd place over this period.

Gross result

€375.7m

+15.6% vs previous season

2nd highest value of 18

Wage bill

€168.9m

+14.9% vs previous season

3rd highest value of 18

Net result

€2.8m

−€6.1m vs previous season

2nd highest value of 18

Equity

€131.7m

+€0.3m vs previous season

5th highest value of 18

Equity ratio

28.2%

−5.9pp vs previous season

10th highest value of 18

RB Leipzig has increased its gross result by 68% since 2018/19

2018/19 to 2024/25, €m

  • League median

Source: DFL, club financial figures

RB Leipzig: league position and revenue rank on average 0.6 places apart

2018/19 to 2024/25

  • League position
  • Revenue rank on the gross result

Source: DFL, club financial figures; final tables

Equity: RB Leipzig

2018/19 to 2024/25, €m

Source: DFL, club financial figures

Equity ratio 2020/21

28.2%

low: below 30% is considered thin.

10th highest value of 18 · league median 32.4%

RB Leipzig: equity ratio down 19 percentage points since 2018/19

Shares of total assets, 2018/19 to 2024/25

Source: DFL, club financial figures

RB Leipzig closes 2020/21 with a surplus of €2.8m

2020/21, €m, excluding items under €50k

Source: DFL, club financial figures

RB Leipzig: wage ratio stable at around 45% since 2018/19

2018/19 to 2024/25

  • RB Leipzig by season
  • Bundesliga 2024/25

Source: DFL, club financial figures

Season 2020/21

Position in the league

Key figureValueRankMedianworsebetter
Gross result €375.7m2 of 18 2 of 18 €135.7m
Wage bill €168.9m3 of 18 3 of 18 €86.3m
Wage ratio 45.0%17 of 18 17 of 18 59.1%
Net result €2.8m2 of 18 2 of 18 −€4.4m
Equity €131.7m5 of 18 5 of 18 €50.4m
Equity ratio 28.2%10 of 18 10 of 18 32.4%
Liabilities €292.3m1 of 18 1 of 18 €93.5m
Payments to player agents €25.9m2 of 18 2 of 18 €7.3m

RB Leipzig has the second-highest gross result in the Bundesliga

18 clubs, 2020/21, €m

  • Median

Source: DFL, club financial figures

Compare with

Clubs of similar size

All four compared