Gross result
€29.8m
+5.3% vs previous season
14th highest value of 15 (3 without figures)
Eintracht Braunschweig
below the second tier 2018/19, 2. Bundesliga 2020/21, below the second tier 2021/22, 2. Bundesliga 2022/23 to 2023/24. On the gross result, from 13th to 14th place over this period.
Wage bill
€16.0m
+10.2% vs previous season
13th highest value of 15 (3 without figures)
Net result
−€0.2m
−€0.4m vs previous season
9th highest value of 15 (3 without figures)
Equity
€0.6m
−€0.2m vs previous season
11th highest value of 15 (3 without figures)
Equity ratio
6.1%
−1.5pp vs previous season
9th highest value of 15 (3 without figures)
Braunschweig has increased its gross result by 42% since 2018/19
2018/19 to 2024/25, €m
- League median
Source: DFL, club financial figures
Braunschweig: on average 2.8 places worse in the table than on revenue
2018/19 to 2024/25
- League position
- Revenue rank on the gross result
Source: DFL, club financial figures; final tables
Equity: Braunschweig
2018/19 to 2024/25, €m
Source: DFL, club financial figures
Equity ratio 2023/24
6.1%
very low: below 10% is considered critical.
Braunschweig: equity ratio down 17 percentage points since 2018/19
Shares of total assets, 2018/19 to 2024/25
Source: DFL, club financial figures
Braunschweig closes 2023/24 with a deficit of €0.2m
2023/24, €m, excluding items under €50k
Source: DFL, club financial figures
Braunschweig: wage ratio from 58% (2018/19) to 51% (2024/25)
2018/19 to 2024/25
- Braunschweig by season
- 2. Bundesliga 2024/25
Source: DFL, club financial figures
Season 2023/24
Position in the league
| Key figure | Value | better |
|---|---|---|
| Gross result | €29.8m14 of 15 | |
| Wage bill | €16.0m13 of 15 | |
| Wage ratio | 53.7%3 of 15 | |
| Net result | −€0.2m9 of 15 | |
| Equity | €0.6m11 of 15 | |
| Equity ratio | 6.1%9 of 15 | |
| Liabilities | €5.0m12 of 15 | |
| Payments to player agents | €0.8m11 of 15 |
Braunschweig ranks 14th on the gross result in the 2. Bundesliga
15 clubs, 2023/24, €m
- Median
Source: DFL, club financial figures
Compare with
