FC Bayern München

Bundesliga

Bundesliga 2018/19 to 2022/23. On the gross result, consistently in place 1.

Gross result

€812.3m

+29.7% vs previous season

Highest value of 18

Wage bill

€415.5m

+19.2% vs previous season

Highest value of 18

Net result

€35.7m

+€23.0m vs previous season

Highest value of 18

Equity

€536.5m

+€32.5m vs previous season

Highest value of 18

Equity ratio

60.7%

−10.0pp vs previous season

3rd highest value of 18

Bayern München has increased its gross result by 29% since 2018/19

2018/19 to 2024/25, €m

  • League median

Source: DFL, club financial figures

Bayern München: league position and revenue rank on average 0.3 places apart

2018/19 to 2024/25

  • League position
  • Revenue rank on the gross result

Source: DFL, club financial figures; final tables

Equity: Bayern München

2018/19 to 2024/25, €m

Source: DFL, club financial figures

Equity ratio 2022/23

60.7%

high: above 50% is rare in the league.

3rd highest value of 18 · league median 24.2%

Bayern München: equity ratio down 7 percentage points since 2018/19

Shares of total assets, 2018/19 to 2024/25

Source: DFL, club financial figures

Bayern München closes 2022/23 with a surplus of €35.7m

2022/23, €m, excluding items under €50k

Source: DFL, club financial figures

Bayern München: wage ratio stable at around 48% since 2018/19

2018/19 to 2024/25

  • Bayern München by season
  • Bundesliga 2024/25

Source: DFL, club financial figures

Season 2022/23

Position in the league

Key figureValueRankMedianworsebetter
Gross result €812.3m1 of 18 1 of 18 €168.9m
Wage bill €415.5m1 of 18 1 of 18 €89.0m
Wage ratio 51.2%5 of 18 5 of 18 49.3%
Net result €35.7m1 of 18 1 of 18 €1.1m
Equity €536.5m1 of 18 1 of 18 €34.5m
Equity ratio 60.7%3 of 18 3 of 18 24.2%
Liabilities €208.7m2 of 18 2 of 18 €95.5m
Payments to player agents €31.4m1 of 18 1 of 18 €7.5m

Bayern München has the highest gross result in the Bundesliga

18 clubs, 2022/23, €m

  • Median

Source: DFL, club financial figures

Compare with

Clubs of similar size

All four compared