SK Sturm Graz

Bundesliga

Bundesliga 2018/19 to 2022/23. On revenue, from 4th to 2nd place over this period.

Revenue

€46.5m

+63.0% vs previous season

2nd highest value of 12

Wage bill

€20.1m

+38.9% vs previous season

2nd highest value of 12

Net result

€2.0m

−€0.3m vs previous season

2nd highest value of 12

Equity

€7.9m

+€2.0m vs previous season

4th highest value of 12

Equity ratio

37.2%

−4.0pp vs previous season

5th highest value of 12

Sturm Graz has increased its revenue by 403% since 2018/19

2018/19 to 2024/25, €m

  • League median

Source: Österreichische Fußball-Bundesliga, annual reports

Sturm Graz: league position and revenue rank on average 0.7 places apart

2018/19 to 2024/25

  • League position
  • Revenue rank on revenue

Source: Österreichische Fußball-Bundesliga, annual reports; final tables

Equity: Sturm Graz

2018/19 to 2024/25, €m

Source: Österreichische Fußball-Bundesliga, annual reports

Equity ratio 2022/23

37.2%

solid: above 30% is considered stable.

5th highest value of 12 · league median 33.8%

Sturm Graz: equity ratio down 14 percentage points since 2018/19

Shares of total equity and debt, as the league publishes the balance sheet, 2018/19 to 2024/25

Source: Österreichische Fußball-Bundesliga, annual reports

Sturm Graz: wage ratio from 57% (2018/19) to 36% (2024/25)

2018/19 to 2024/25

  • Sturm Graz by season
  • Bundesliga 2024/25

Source: Österreichische Fußball-Bundesliga, annual reports

Season 2022/23

Position in the league

Key figureValueRankMedianworsebetter
Revenue €46.5m2 of 12 2 of 12 €11.4m
Wage bill €20.1m2 of 12 2 of 12 €6.4m
Wage ratio 43.2%9 of 12 9 of 12 51.9%
Net result €2.0m2 of 12 2 of 12 €0.1m
Equity €7.9m4 of 12 4 of 12 €2.6m
Equity ratio 37.2%5 of 12 5 of 12 33.8%
Debt €13.3m5 of 12 5 of 12 €7.1m
Payments to player agents €3.0m1 of 12 1 of 12 €0.4m

Sturm Graz has the second-highest revenue in the Bundesliga

12 clubs, 2022/23, €m

  • Median

Source: Österreichische Fußball-Bundesliga, annual reports

Compare with

Clubs of similar size

All four compared