Gross result
€19.5m
+14.9% vs previous season
14th highest value of 15 (3 without figures)
SV Sandhausen
Strongest growth in the 2. Bundesliga 2020/21: gross result +15% vs prior year.
2. Bundesliga 2018/19 to 2020/21. On the gross result, from 12th to 14th place over this period.
Wage bill
€11.4m
−12.0% vs previous season
14th highest value of 15 (3 without figures)
Net result
€1.0m
+€2.8m vs previous season
5th highest value of 15 (3 without figures)
Equity
€0.8m
+€1.2m vs previous season
13th highest value of 15 (3 without figures)
Equity ratio
8.0%
+11.9pp vs previous season
12th highest value of 15 (3 without figures)
Sandhausen has reduced its gross result by 7% since 2018/19
2018/19 to 2020/21, €m
- League median
Source: DFL, club financial figures
Sandhausen: league position and revenue rank on average 0.7 places apart
2018/19 to 2024/25
- League position
- Revenue rank on the gross result
Source: DFL, club financial figures; final tables
Sandhausen has eliminated its negative equity
2018/19 to 2020/21, €m
Source: DFL, club financial figures
Equity ratio 2020/21
8.0%
very low: below 10% is considered critical.
Sandhausen: equity ratio down 7 percentage points since 2018/19
Shares of total assets, 2018/19 to 2020/21
Source: DFL, club financial figures
Sandhausen closes 2020/21 with a surplus of €1.0m
2020/21, €m, excluding items under €50k
Source: DFL, club financial figures
Sandhausen: wage ratio from 63% (2018/19) to 59% (2020/21)
2018/19 to 2020/21
- Sandhausen by season
- 2. Bundesliga 2020/21
Source: DFL, club financial figures
Season 2020/21
Position in the league
| Key figure | Value | better |
|---|---|---|
| Gross result | €19.5m14 of 15 | |
| Wage bill | €11.4m14 of 15 | |
| Wage ratio | 58.5%7 of 15 | |
| Net result | €1.0m5 of 15 | |
| Equity | €0.8m13 of 15 | |
| Equity ratio | 8.0%12 of 15 | |
| Liabilities | €7.5m11 of 15 | |
| Payments to player agents | €0.6m11 of 15 |
Sandhausen ranks 14th on the gross result in the 2. Bundesliga
15 clubs, 2020/21, €m
- Median
Source: DFL, club financial figures
Compare with
