TSV Hartberg

Bundesliga

Bundesliga 2018/19 to 2021/22. On revenue, from 12th to 11th place over this period.

Revenue

€6.4m

+8.4% vs previous season

11th highest value of 12

Wage bill

€4.5m

+10.6% vs previous season

11th highest value of 12

Net result

−€0.1m

−€0.4m vs previous season

10th highest value of 12

Equity

€1.9m

+€1.3m vs previous season

8th highest value of 12

Equity ratio

73.5%

+36.2pp vs previous season

Highest value of 12

Hartberg has increased its revenue by 177% since 2018/19

2018/19 to 2024/25, €m

  • League median

Source: Österreichische Fußball-Bundesliga, annual reports

Hartberg: on average 2.4 places better in the table than on revenue

2018/19 to 2024/25

  • League position
  • Revenue rank on revenue

Source: Österreichische Fußball-Bundesliga, annual reports; final tables

Hartberg has eliminated its negative equity

2018/19 to 2024/25, €m

Source: Österreichische Fußball-Bundesliga, annual reports

Equity ratio 2021/22

73.5%

high: above 50% is rare in the league.

Highest value of 12 · league median 33.6%

Hartberg: equity ratio up 77 percentage points since 2018/19

Shares of total equity and debt, as the league publishes the balance sheet, 2018/19 to 2024/25

Source: Österreichische Fußball-Bundesliga, annual reports

Hartberg: wage ratio from 63% (2018/19) to 52% (2024/25)

2018/19 to 2024/25

  • Hartberg by season
  • Bundesliga 2024/25

Source: Österreichische Fußball-Bundesliga, annual reports

Season 2021/22

Position in the league

Key figureValueRankMedianworsebetter
Revenue €6.4m11 of 12 11 of 12 €10.4m
Wage bill €4.5m11 of 12 11 of 12 €6.2m
Wage ratio 70.0%2 of 12 2 of 12 54.1%
Net result −€0.1m10 of 12 10 of 12 €0.4m
Equity €1.9m8 of 12 8 of 12 €2.3m
Equity ratio 73.5%1 of 12 1 of 12 33.6%
Debt €0.7m12 of 12 12 of 12 €7.0m
Payments to player agents €0.2m9 of 11 9 of 11 €0.5m

Hartberg ranks 11th on revenue in the Bundesliga

12 clubs, 2021/22, €m

  • Median

Source: Österreichische Fußball-Bundesliga, annual reports

Compare with

Clubs of similar size

All four compared