TSV Hartberg

Bundesliga

Bundesliga 2018/19 to 2022/23. On revenue, from 12th to 10th place over this period.

Revenue

€7.5m

+18.2% vs previous season

10th highest value of 12

Wage bill

€6.2m

+39.9% vs previous season

8th highest value of 12

Net result

−€1.1m

−€1.0m vs previous season

9th highest value of 12

Equity

€0.8m

−€1.1m vs previous season

9th highest value of 12

Equity ratio

55.3%

−18.2pp vs previous season

4th highest value of 12

Hartberg has increased its revenue by 177% since 2018/19

2018/19 to 2024/25, €m

  • League median

Source: Österreichische Fußball-Bundesliga, annual reports

Hartberg: on average 2.4 places better in the table than on revenue

2018/19 to 2024/25

  • League position
  • Revenue rank on revenue

Source: Österreichische Fußball-Bundesliga, annual reports; final tables

Hartberg has eliminated its negative equity

2018/19 to 2024/25, €m

Source: Österreichische Fußball-Bundesliga, annual reports

Equity ratio 2022/23

55.3%

high: above 50% is rare in the league.

4th highest value of 12 · league median 33.8%

Hartberg: equity ratio up 77 percentage points since 2018/19

Shares of total equity and debt, as the league publishes the balance sheet, 2018/19 to 2024/25

Source: Österreichische Fußball-Bundesliga, annual reports

Hartberg: wage ratio from 63% (2018/19) to 52% (2024/25)

2018/19 to 2024/25

  • Hartberg by season
  • Bundesliga 2024/25

Source: Österreichische Fußball-Bundesliga, annual reports

Season 2022/23

Position in the league

Key figureValueRankMedianworsebetter
Revenue €7.5m10 of 12 10 of 12 €11.4m
Wage bill €6.2m8 of 12 8 of 12 €6.4m
Wage ratio 82.9%1 of 12 1 of 12 51.9%
Net result −€1.1m9 of 12 9 of 12 €0.1m
Equity €0.8m9 of 12 9 of 12 €2.6m
Equity ratio 55.3%4 of 12 4 of 12 33.8%
Debt €0.6m12 of 12 12 of 12 €7.1m
Payments to player agents €0.3m10 of 12 10 of 12 €0.4m

Hartberg ranks 10th on revenue in the Bundesliga

12 clubs, 2022/23, €m

  • Median

Source: Österreichische Fußball-Bundesliga, annual reports

Compare with

Clubs of similar size

All four compared