Financial table
-
Jahn Regensburg
- AC183%
- EQ72%
- WR42%
- LV0.4×
-
Dynamo Dresden
- AC300%
- EQ44%
- WR45%
- LV1.3×
-
Darmstadt 98
- AC100%
- EQ52%
- WR54%
- LV0.9×
-
Greuther Fürth
- AC83%
- EQ40%
- WR59%
- LV1.5×
Column
| Pos. | Club | ||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1215.6 | 3183% | 372% | 342% | 30.4× | 4 | 12±0 | 12.0 | 12 | 5.4 | |
| 2 | 1215.1 | 3300% | 344% | 345% | 31.3× | 4 | – | 12.0 | 18 | 1.3 | |
| 3 | 1214.7 | 3100% | 352% | 354% | 30.9× | 4 | 12±0 | 12.0 | 5 | 0.9 | |
| 4 | 1213.6 | 383% | 340% | 359% | 31.5× | 4 | 12±0 | 12.0 | 9 | −4.0 | |
| 5 | 1112.8 | 255% | 337% | 357% | 31.7× | 3 | 12−1 | 11.5 | 11 | −1.3 | |
| 6 | 1112.1 | 245% | 335% | 358% | 31.9× | 3 | 9+2 | 10.0 | 15 | −18.7 | |
| 7 | 910.3 | 231% | 225% | 346% | 23.0× | 1 | 8+1 | 8.5 | 4 | −6.7 | |
| 8 | 89.8 | 240% | 226% | 262% | 22.9× | 0 | 9−1 | 8.5 | 6 | −11.1 | |
| 9 | 89.3 | 231% | 222% | 351% | 13.5× | 1 | 7+1 | 7.5 | 14 | −0.6 | |
| 10 | 67.7 | 236% | 115% | 345% | 05.7× | 1 | 5+1 | 5.5 | 16 | 1.8 | |
| 11 | 55.9 | 12% | 11% | 347% | 073.4× | 1 | 5±0 | 5.0 | 3 | −1.3 | |
| 12 | 46.1 | 120% | 110% | 261% | 08.7× | 0 | 5−1 | 4.5 | 7 | 0.0 | |
| 13 | 35.1 | 122% | 117% | 175% | 05.0× | 0 | 11−8 | 7.0 | 2 | −28.4 | |
| 14 | 33.5 | 00% | 00% | 353% | 0equity < 0 | 1 | 5−2 | 4.0 | 8 | −3.0 | |
| 15 | 33.0 | 0−55% | 0−28% | 360% | 0equity < 0 | 1 | 3±0 | 3.0 | 1 | −2.0 | |
| 16 | 11.4 | 0−5% | 0−4% | 176% | 0equity < 0 | 0 | 4−3 | 2.5 | 10 | −1.7 |
Clubs by points
4 of 16 clubs meet all four targets; the fewest points come from the leverage
2019/20, points per ratio, at most 12
Source: DFL, club financial figures
The financial table of the 2. Bundesliga over 2 seasons
Place 1 to 16 by points, 2018/19 to 2019/20
Source: DFL, club financial figures
Bielefeld: place 1 in the table, place 15 on finances, the widest gap in the 2. Bundesliga 2019/20
2. Bundesliga 2019/20, rank correlation −0.45
Source: DFL, club financial figures; final tables
Method
Four key figures, 0 to 3 points each, equally weighted, 12 at most. Three points: target met. On equal points the fine score decides: within each band, the distance to the next threshold; above the target, the distance beyond it with decreasing weight; at most 4 per key figure. Then the average of all seasons. Peer group: the clubs of the same league and season.
| Key figure | 3 points | 2 points | 1 point | 0 points |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Fixed-asset coverage AC | > 60% | > 30% | > 0% | ≤ 0% |
| Equity ratio EQ | > 30% | > 20% | > 0% | ≤ 0% |
| Wage ratio WR | < 60% | < 70% | < 80% | ≥ 80% |
| Leverage LV | < 2 | < 3 | < 4 | ≥ 4 or negative equity |